DAOs have become a significant organizational structure
in Web3, bringing new ways of organizing communities and
treasuries, utilizing decentralized voting on-chain to
take action such as distributing funds. But while the
goal of these organizations is to enable communities to
make effective decentralized decision-making, the
current tools available often do not scale, nor are they
able to achieve this vision completely. Not only do
operations become increasingly harder to manage as they
become fragmented across various platforms, but the
identity of members in the community becomes lost or
diluted, effectively reducing complex decisions to a
sterile and scattered voting system.
What if DAOs could integrate — or, better yet, were
innately built on — a suite of foundational tools that
combined not only complex voting structures but
incorporated identity as well?
By building tools that capture expressed identity— i.e.,
connections between individuals, content represented
on-chain, or even sentiment —DAO tools can expand to
include social features that otherwise would only exist
in separate off-chain siloes, nearly impossible to
measure.
Suddenly a method of genuinely effective decentralized
coordination would be at a DAO’s fingertips. So…
What if DAOs had a tool that enabled them to have a
consolidated view of their operations and
communications?
What if DAOs had more elaborate voting systems based
on group membership, allowing some communities to run
in a representative manner with boards or committees
empowered to make certain decisions?
What if DAOs had a dashboard for members that
automatically showed their collective interests,
authorship, and favorite content, thus easily enabling
the creation sub-DAOs?
These tools could look like many things. What if you
built them?